Cancer Treatments
February 19th, 2012 | 
Author: Greater than 5,000 people search the world wide web, monthly, for “cancer alternative cures.” Does this search represent “unrealistic hope”, as mainstream medicine characterizes all claims that cancer is usually quite curable with natural substances? Or does this represent an expanding need for information that is suppressed by powerful corporate interests who make vast amounts of dollars every year by giving “treatments” to “manage” an illness that is said to be incurable? Few health subjects elicit stronger emotions than natural cures for cancer, as well as great reasons.
In line with the American Cancer Society (ACS), cancer killed 1,500 people every single day, in the usa, in 2008. Taking 565,650 lives a year helps it be the second leading reason for death after coronary disease. The mainstream medical way of treating cancer invariably involves a combination of surgery, chemotherapy and radiation. All of these protocols are highly invasive, have serious side effects, and may severely weaken the disease fighting capability, leaving the person vulnerable to secondary infections and complications. Furthermore, for most families, additional strain is produced by the extremely high price of these treatments. As the ACS says, “for virtually all patients, cancer alternative treatment presents a tremendous financial burden.” (Cancer Facts and Figures, 2008).
For many these reasons you will find there’s burgeoning desire for “cancer natural cures” although entire field of natural cures has become discredited as unscientific for the past A hundred years, ever since The Flexner Report in 1910. This report generated a standardized curriculum for all those medical schools in the usa, after it turned out embraced by the Council on Medical Education of The Ama.
Researchers of natural cures point out the backing and influence with the Rockefeller and Carnegie foundations inside promotion and implementation with the Flexner Report, which generated a subsequent concentrate on pharmacology both in the curriculum and funded research projects at medical schools.
The intense distrust involving the two sides with this debate is reflected inside a detailed complaint brought before the International Court arrest inside Hague, in June of 2003, by Dr. Mathias Rath. In this complaint, “pharmaceutical companies including Pfizer, Merck, GlaxoSmithKline, Novartis, Amgen and Astra Zeneca are accused of deliberately preventing life-saving natural options to drug based treatments from being used in prevention and cure.”
With regards to this short article, which is to let the growing desire for natural cures for cancer, we cannot look further into the alleged conflicts of interest within mainstream medicine just as one industry. I only bring it up to describe why natural cures generally continue to be discredited by medical authorities.
Once we turn our care about the history of research into natural strategies to curing cancer, we find many stories of brilliant researchers who have found an incredible selection of cures. I’ll just mention several.
Harry Hoxsey was entrusted by his Great Grandfather having an herbal formula and tonic that many many people swore cured them of cancer. Despite, or possibly, as the Hoxsey Clinic grew to be the biggest privately operated cancer clinic in the usa, he was labeled a quack plus a charlatan by the medical community. He was finally expected to close his clinic by the AMA, and the head nurse, Mildred Nelson moved to Mexico to continue offering the treatment.
Royal Raymond Rife was obviously a brilliant inventor who combined three main areas of interest; microscopes, microbiology and electronics. He first distinguished himself by designing and building amazingly powerful microscopes that achieved unusual degrees of magnification while simultaneously allowing the observed organisms to keep alive. (Modern electron microscopes get rid of the organisms being observed.) This is imperative to his future research.
Next Rife attempt to isolate cancer microbe, which took him twelve years. He succeeded in 1932. Create spent a large number of hours observing the effect of specific electronic frequencies on living cancer microbes until he discovered the precise frequency that killed cancer microbe, that they could observe through his microscope. After proving the effectiveness of the treatment in numerous animal studies, and human trials, Rife started to manufacture the “Frequency Instruments.”
Naturally you would expect that Rife was celebrated as being a hero in neuro-scientific cancer research. Well, you enter for a surprise. He was sued, harassed and lastly closed down by the AMA in 1960. His colleague was imprisoned for 3 years, even though 14 patents testified for the effectiveness with the machine.
I simply have space to note yet another researcher, Dr. Otto Warburg, who, in 1931, won a Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine for locating that cancer cells are only able to thrive in the anaerobic (oxygen deprived) environment. In a lecture in the meeting with the Nobel-Laureates on June 30, 1966, in Germany he stated, “As emphasized, oahu is the first precondition with the proposed treatment that every growing cells be saturated with oxygen.”
This discovery exposed a whole field of research into “bio-oxidative therapies”, that have proven quite effective in curing cancer, in addition to a whole host of other diseases. It is because many diseases require an anaerobic environment to outlive.
However, pricier to view a significant announcement inside mainstream media before i write again. It is because oxygen therapy, inside types of ozonated water and/or food grade peroxide, might be self-administered, in your house, very inexpensively. Because of this you could expect that it will be discredited with the full force with the medical profession. Take this into account as you search the world wide web for “cancer natural cures,” in addition to being you weigh the options to stop cancer.
Posted in 
Tags: